“In the Indian Constitution, Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy are complementary to each other.” Explain.

by

Points to Remember:

  • Fundamental Rights (FRs) are justiciable, enforceable rights guaranteeing individual liberties.
  • Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) are non-justiciable, guidelines for the state to achieve social and economic justice.
  • Both FRs and DPSPs aim for a just and equitable society, albeit through different mechanisms.
  • The relationship between FRs and DPSPs is one of complementarity, not conflict.

Introduction:

The Indian Constitution, a unique blend of liberal democracy and socialist ideals, incorporates both Fundamental Rights (FRs) enshrined in Part III and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) enshrined in Part IV. While often viewed as distinct, a closer examination reveals a complementary relationship between them, working in tandem to achieve the overarching goal of a just and equitable society. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized this complementary nature, recognizing that neither can be fully realized without the other. The preamble itself reflects this balance, aiming for a “socialist, secular, democratic republic” – a vision that requires both individual liberties and social welfare measures.

Body:

1. Fundamental Rights as the Foundation:

FRs, including the right to equality, freedom, against exploitation, freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, and right to constitutional remedies, form the bedrock of individual liberty. They act as a shield protecting citizens from state encroachment and ensuring their basic freedoms. These rights are justiciable, meaning they can be enforced in courts of law. For example, the right to life (Article 21) has been interpreted broadly by the Supreme Court to encompass various aspects of a dignified life, including the right to clean environment, education, and healthcare.

2. Directive Principles as the Guiding Star:

DPSPs, on the other hand, outline the socio-economic goals the state should strive to achieve. These include providing free and compulsory education, securing a living wage, ensuring social security, promoting equal pay for equal work, and organizing village panchayats. They are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be directly enforced in courts. However, they serve as guiding principles for the state’s legislative and executive actions. They represent the state’s commitment to social and economic justice, aiming to create a society where everyone has equal opportunities.

3. Complementarity in Action:

The complementarity between FRs and DPSPs is evident in various aspects:

  • Harmonious Interpretation: The Supreme Court has consistently attempted to harmonize FRs and DPSPs, recognizing that their apparent conflict can be resolved through a balanced interpretation. For instance, the right to property (originally a FR, now a legal right) has been balanced with the DPSPs related to land reforms and social justice.
  • FRs Enabling DPSPs: The enjoyment of FRs creates an environment conducive to the implementation of DPSPs. For example, freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) is crucial for public participation in the democratic process, which is essential for achieving social and economic justice.
  • DPSPs Shaping FRs: DPSPs influence the interpretation and application of FRs. The state’s commitment to social justice, as reflected in DPSPs, informs the court’s interpretation of FRs, ensuring that they are not used to perpetuate inequalities. For example, the right to education (a DPSP) has influenced the interpretation of the right to life, leading to the recognition of the right to free and compulsory education.

4. Challenges and Limitations:

While the ideal is complementarity, challenges remain. The non-justiciable nature of DPSPs can hinder their effective implementation. Furthermore, resource constraints and political will can impede the state’s ability to fulfill its commitments under the DPSPs.

Conclusion:

The Indian Constitution’s design, incorporating both FRs and DPSPs, reflects a conscious attempt to balance individual liberties with social justice. While FRs provide the necessary safeguards for individual rights, DPSPs guide the state towards achieving a more just and equitable society. Their relationship is one of complementarity, not conflict. To strengthen this complementarity, greater emphasis should be placed on the effective implementation of DPSPs through appropriate legislation, policy interventions, and resource allocation. This requires a holistic approach, involving all stakeholders, to ensure that the constitutional vision of a just and equitable society is realized, upholding both individual freedoms and social welfare, thereby promoting sustainable and inclusive development.

MPPCS  Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for MPPCS  Prelims and MPPCS  Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by MPPCS  Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––