Discretionary Power of the Governor is mentioned in which Article of the Constitution?

Points to Remember:

  • The Indian Constitution grants significant discretionary powers to the Governor, primarily in situations involving the breakdown of constitutional machinery in a state.
  • These powers are not explicitly defined in a single article but are scattered across several articles, interpreted through judicial pronouncements and conventions.
  • The extent and exercise of these discretionary powers have been a subject of debate and judicial scrutiny.

Introduction:

The Governor of a state in India is the head of the state, appointed by the President. While largely a titular head, the Constitution vests certain discretionary powers in the Governor, particularly in situations requiring decisive action in times of political instability or constitutional crisis. These powers are not explicitly listed under a single article but are inferred from various provisions and interpreted through judicial precedents. Understanding the scope and limitations of these discretionary powers is crucial for maintaining the balance of power within the federal structure of India.

Body:

1. Articles Granting Discretionary Powers (Implicitly):

The Constitution doesn’t explicitly mention “discretionary powers” as a single entity. Instead, several articles implicitly grant the Governor certain discretionary powers. These include:

  • Article 163: This article deals with the Governor’s power to act in his/her discretion in matters relating to the Council of Ministers. While it doesn’t explicitly state “discretionary powers,” it implies the Governor’s independent judgment in certain situations.
  • Article 174: This article relates to the summoning and prorogation of the state legislature. The Governor has some discretion in this matter, although it is generally exercised on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
  • Article 356: This article deals with the President’s Rule in a state. While the President imposes President’s Rule, the Governor plays a crucial role in recommending its imposition, making it a significant discretionary power. The Governor’s report forms the basis for the President’s decision.
  • Article 200: This article grants the Governor the power to reserve certain bills passed by the state legislature for the President’s consideration. The Governor’s decision on which bills to reserve is a discretionary power.
  • Article 164(1): This article states that the Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor. While usually appointed based on the majority in the legislature, the Governor has some discretion, particularly in hung assemblies or post-election scenarios.

2. Judicial Interpretation and Limitations:

The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in defining the scope and limitations of the Governor’s discretionary powers. The Court has emphasized that these powers should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances. Excessive or arbitrary use of discretionary powers can be challenged in court. The Court has consistently stressed the need for the Governor to act fairly and impartially, upholding the principles of the Constitution.

3. Examples of Discretionary Power Exercise:

Instances where Governors have exercised discretionary powers include:

  • Appointment of Chief Ministers in hung assemblies or during periods of political instability.
  • Recommending the imposition of President’s Rule under Article 356.
  • Reserving bills passed by the state legislature for the President’s consideration.

4. Debate and Concerns:

The extent of the Governor’s discretionary powers has been a subject of debate. Critics argue that these powers can be misused to undermine democratic processes and favor particular political parties. Concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency and accountability in the exercise of these powers.

Conclusion:

The discretionary powers of the Governor are not confined to a single article but are scattered across several articles of the Constitution. While these powers are essential for maintaining stability during constitutional crises, their exercise must be judicious, transparent, and accountable. The Supreme Court’s role in interpreting and limiting these powers is crucial. A clear framework, possibly through legislative amendments or further judicial pronouncements, is needed to define the boundaries of these powers more precisely and ensure their responsible exercise, safeguarding the principles of federalism and democratic governance. This will contribute to a more robust and stable democratic system, upholding the constitutional values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.

MPPCS  Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for MPPCS  Prelims and MPPCS  Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by MPPCS  Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––